<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 92 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of Rs. 45,000 as entertainment expenditure under section 37(2) was not justified. The Tribunal found that the contribution made to the &quot;Food Festival&quot; organized by the Pacific Area Travels Association (India) served legitimate business purposes, including promoting tourism and fostering international relations. Emphasizing the event&#039;s significance within the tourism industry and the government&#039;s involvement, the Tribunal concluded that the expenditure was not entertainment but a valid expense aligned with the assessee&#039;s business objectives. The appeal was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 45,000 was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:41:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 92 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of Rs. 45,000 as entertainment expenditure under section 37(2) was not justified. The Tribunal found that the contribution made to the &quot;Food Festival&quot; organized by the Pacific Area Travels Association (India) served legitimate business purposes, including promoting tourism and fostering international relations. Emphasizing the event&#039;s significance within the tourism industry and the government&#039;s involvement, the Tribunal concluded that the expenditure was not entertainment but a valid expense aligned with the assessee&#039;s business objectives. The appeal was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 45,000 was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>