<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 101 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58356</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and remanded the case for reassessment of the valuation of distributorship rights in films for wealth-tax assessment. The court emphasized the inclusion of all valuable rights of the assessee in the net wealth calculation, contrary to the previous decision. The judgment allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79, directing a comprehensive reassessment to ensure accuracy in determining the assessee&#039;s net wealth.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:25:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 101 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58356</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and remanded the case for reassessment of the valuation of distributorship rights in films for wealth-tax assessment. The court emphasized the inclusion of all valuable rights of the assessee in the net wealth calculation, contrary to the previous decision. The judgment allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79, directing a comprehensive reassessment to ensure accuracy in determining the assessee&#039;s net wealth.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>