<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 89 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58345</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, ruling that the assessment was time-barred, the ITO exceeded jurisdiction by including new income items in the reassessment, the partnership firm was genuine, and the assessee qualified for the Section 47(ii) exemption. Additionally, no capital gains tax was applicable due to the revaluation of business assets and lack of consideration received in a subsequent transfer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:51:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 89 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58345</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, ruling that the assessment was time-barred, the ITO exceeded jurisdiction by including new income items in the reassessment, the partnership firm was genuine, and the assessee qualified for the Section 47(ii) exemption. Additionally, no capital gains tax was applicable due to the revaluation of business assets and lack of consideration received in a subsequent transfer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>