<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 84 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, as the explanations provided by the assessee for the additions to their income were disbelieved but not proven false, not falling under Explanation 1(A). The penalty was overturned, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 84 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, as the explanations provided by the assessee for the additions to their income were disbelieved but not proven false, not falling under Explanation 1(A). The penalty was overturned, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>