<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 107 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees in both the gift-tax and wealth-tax assessments. It held that the admission of a new partner and realignment of profit-sharing ratios in a partnership firm did not constitute a gift under the Gift-tax Act, 1958, as it was based on valid business considerations. Additionally, the assessees were not liable for wealth-tax on the relinquished asset appreciation as per the partnership deed terms, as determined by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 14:27:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 107 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees in both the gift-tax and wealth-tax assessments. It held that the admission of a new partner and realignment of profit-sharing ratios in a partnership firm did not constitute a gift under the Gift-tax Act, 1958, as it was based on valid business considerations. Additionally, the assessees were not liable for wealth-tax on the relinquished asset appreciation as per the partnership deed terms, as determined by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>