<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 135 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the firm, acting as an agent for Merchant Manufacturers, was not liable for excise duty and had fulfilled its obligations as per the Supreme Court order. The disallowance u/s 43B was unjustified, and the appeals were allowed. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute income for all assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 14:25:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 135 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the firm, acting as an agent for Merchant Manufacturers, was not liable for excise duty and had fulfilled its obligations as per the Supreme Court order. The disallowance u/s 43B was unjustified, and the appeals were allowed. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute income for all assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>