<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 181 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58308</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of interest payments made to both M/s. P.R. Enterprises and Bombay Mercantile Bank for the respective assessment years. The decision emphasized the necessity of establishing a direct nexus between borrowed funds and business purposes to claim deductions under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. Despite arguments by the assessee&#039;s counsel, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the deduction claims, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals and affirmation of the disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 13:48:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 181 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58308</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of interest payments made to both M/s. P.R. Enterprises and Bombay Mercantile Bank for the respective assessment years. The decision emphasized the necessity of establishing a direct nexus between borrowed funds and business purposes to claim deductions under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. Despite arguments by the assessee&#039;s counsel, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the deduction claims, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals and affirmation of the disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>