<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 120 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by deleting penalties for certain cash credits and interest payments where the explanation was considered bona fide. However, penalties were restored for other cash credits and interest payments where the explanation was not deemed bona fide. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be levied solely based on assessment orders and must be supported by evidence of conscious concealment of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 13:44:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 120 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by deleting penalties for certain cash credits and interest payments where the explanation was considered bona fide. However, penalties were restored for other cash credits and interest payments where the explanation was not deemed bona fide. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be levied solely based on assessment orders and must be supported by evidence of conscious concealment of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>