<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 128 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment for the assessment year 1981-82, ruling that the assessment order, passed within the extended period, was valid despite exceeding the 180-day period for obtaining directions. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the decision to allow depreciation at 10% for a weighing machine, rejecting the appellant&#039;s claim for 15% depreciation due to exposure to corrosive chemicals. The Tribunal found no basis to overturn the CIT (Appeals) ruling on the depreciation allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 13:43:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 128 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment for the assessment year 1981-82, ruling that the assessment order, passed within the extended period, was valid despite exceeding the 180-day period for obtaining directions. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the decision to allow depreciation at 10% for a weighing machine, rejecting the appellant&#039;s claim for 15% depreciation due to exposure to corrosive chemicals. The Tribunal found no basis to overturn the CIT (Appeals) ruling on the depreciation allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>