<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 73 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58289</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), allowing the appellant, a private limited company engaged in processing and printing of cinematograph films, to claim investment allowance for machinery used in the production of release prints. The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s activities constituted manufacturing during the second stage of production, making it eligible for the investment allowance. The Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s status as a small scale industrial undertaking and precedent cases supporting the allowance, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 13:14:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 73 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58289</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), allowing the appellant, a private limited company engaged in processing and printing of cinematograph films, to claim investment allowance for machinery used in the production of release prints. The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s activities constituted manufacturing during the second stage of production, making it eligible for the investment allowance. The Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s status as a small scale industrial undertaking and precedent cases supporting the allowance, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>