<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 86 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58270</link>
    <description>Stamp duty and conveyancing expenditure borne under the sale arrangement was treated as part of the net sale consideration, so the deceased&#039;s share was deductible in valuing the post-death sale property. Premiums paid within two years of death for policies under the Married Women&#039;s Property Act did not amount to an immediate gift inter vivos under section 9(1) of the Estate Duty Act, because the beneficiaries had only contingent rights in the policy proceeds; the policy monies were also treated as a separate estate under section 34(3). Section 34(1)(c) was applied as a rate-fixing provision, and the lineal descendants&#039; share in joint family property was includible for rate purposes on the basis of notional partition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:17:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 86 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58270</link>
      <description>Stamp duty and conveyancing expenditure borne under the sale arrangement was treated as part of the net sale consideration, so the deceased&#039;s share was deductible in valuing the post-death sale property. Premiums paid within two years of death for policies under the Married Women&#039;s Property Act did not amount to an immediate gift inter vivos under section 9(1) of the Estate Duty Act, because the beneficiaries had only contingent rights in the policy proceeds; the policy monies were also treated as a separate estate under section 34(3). Section 34(1)(c) was applied as a rate-fixing provision, and the lineal descendants&#039; share in joint family property was includible for rate purposes on the basis of notional partition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>