<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 95 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee-firm, allowing the entire selling agents commission paid as a deduction. It concluded that the commission rates were not excessive, justified by the company&#039;s incurred expenses and historical context of the agreement. The Tribunal disagreed with the assessing authority and Commissioner (Appeals), holding that no disallowance under section 40A(2) was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:11:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 95 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee-firm, allowing the entire selling agents commission paid as a deduction. It concluded that the commission rates were not excessive, justified by the company&#039;s incurred expenses and historical context of the agreement. The Tribunal disagreed with the assessing authority and Commissioner (Appeals), holding that no disallowance under section 40A(2) was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>