<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 102 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58261</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee-company, holding that the conversion rate applied by the IAC was correct as per the amended rule 115. The Tribunal determined that rule 115 was procedural and should apply to assessments made after the effective date of the amendment. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 was deemed incorrect and canceled in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 11:57:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 102 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58261</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee-company, holding that the conversion rate applied by the IAC was correct as per the amended rule 115. The Tribunal determined that rule 115 was procedural and should apply to assessments made after the effective date of the amendment. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 was deemed incorrect and canceled in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>