<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (5) TMI 61 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that they were entitled to the investment allowance for plant and machinery installed during the accounting year. The Tribunal considered the purpose and common understanding of varnish in conjunction with the Eleventh Schedule of the Income-tax Act, ultimately determining that the varnish produced by the assessee for electrical insulation did not align with traditional decorative varnishes listed in the schedule. Emphasizing the unique characteristics and specialized application of the varnish in electrical goods, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee qualified for the investment allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 11:37:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (5) TMI 61 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that they were entitled to the investment allowance for plant and machinery installed during the accounting year. The Tribunal considered the purpose and common understanding of varnish in conjunction with the Eleventh Schedule of the Income-tax Act, ultimately determining that the varnish produced by the assessee for electrical insulation did not align with traditional decorative varnishes listed in the schedule. Emphasizing the unique characteristics and specialized application of the varnish in electrical goods, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee qualified for the investment allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>