<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 101 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the taxability of Rs. 1,15,422 as short-term capital gain. The deduction of surtax liability was denied, and section 40(c) was deemed applicable for employee directors&#039; remuneration. Additionally, the fees paid for increasing authorized share capital were considered a capital expenditure, leading to the partial allowance of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:14:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 101 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the taxability of Rs. 1,15,422 as short-term capital gain. The deduction of surtax liability was denied, and section 40(c) was deemed applicable for employee directors&#039; remuneration. Additionally, the fees paid for increasing authorized share capital were considered a capital expenditure, leading to the partial allowance of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>