<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 91 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that Section 64(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act applies to both business and professional concerns, including those operated by individual proprietors. The term &quot;concern&quot; was interpreted broadly to encompass all entities, whether business or professional, without requiring an elaborate organization. &quot;Technical or professional qualifications&quot; were defined liberally to include any fitness for a job requiring intellectual or manual skill. Payments made to the spouse were mandated to be included in the individual&#039;s total income, even if genuine, unless meeting proviso criteria. The Tribunal clarified that double taxation concerns do not arise unless explicitly provided by the Legislature. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the disallowance of payments made to the spouse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:10:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 91 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that Section 64(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act applies to both business and professional concerns, including those operated by individual proprietors. The term &quot;concern&quot; was interpreted broadly to encompass all entities, whether business or professional, without requiring an elaborate organization. &quot;Technical or professional qualifications&quot; were defined liberally to include any fitness for a job requiring intellectual or manual skill. Payments made to the spouse were mandated to be included in the individual&#039;s total income, even if genuine, unless meeting proviso criteria. The Tribunal clarified that double taxation concerns do not arise unless explicitly provided by the Legislature. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the disallowance of payments made to the spouse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>