<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 99 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the refund of excise duty received by the assessee was not taxable under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was determined that since the excise duty was never claimed as a deduction in any previous year and the liability to refund the amount to the customers persisted, Section 41(1) did not apply. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directed the ITO to delete the addition made, ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:29:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 99 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the refund of excise duty received by the assessee was not taxable under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was determined that since the excise duty was never claimed as a deduction in any previous year and the liability to refund the amount to the customers persisted, Section 41(1) did not apply. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directed the ITO to delete the addition made, ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>