<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 147 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58207</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) for failure to disclose the correct value of closing stock, resulting in an increased declared loss. The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee credible, noting the absence of any benefit to the assessee or loss to the Revenue due to the error, which was promptly admitted. It was concluded that there was no guilty intention on the part of the assessee, leading to the cancellation of the penalty and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:10:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 147 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58207</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) for failure to disclose the correct value of closing stock, resulting in an increased declared loss. The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee credible, noting the absence of any benefit to the assessee or loss to the Revenue due to the error, which was promptly admitted. It was concluded that there was no guilty intention on the part of the assessee, leading to the cancellation of the penalty and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>