<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 113 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58206</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed, and the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal made various rulings, including allowing publicity expenses incurred before the Censor Board&#039;s certificate as &quot;cost of production,&quot; directing the full deduction of payment to Shri Raj Kapoor, excluding overseas exploitation income, upholding inclusion of royalty income from gramophone records, and remanding the issue of interest charging. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted certain additions to the assessee&#039;s income related to distribution rights and upheld the classification of the assessee as an industrial company for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:07:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 113 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58206</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed, and the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal made various rulings, including allowing publicity expenses incurred before the Censor Board&#039;s certificate as &quot;cost of production,&quot; directing the full deduction of payment to Shri Raj Kapoor, excluding overseas exploitation income, upholding inclusion of royalty income from gramophone records, and remanding the issue of interest charging. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted certain additions to the assessee&#039;s income related to distribution rights and upheld the classification of the assessee as an industrial company for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>