<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (12) TMI 65 - ITAT  BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58178</link>
    <description>The Departmental appeal was allowed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal restored the original order of the ITO, concluding that the CIT(A) erred in allowing a straight deduction of dividend income under Section 85 before computing losses. The Tribunal also clarified that the rebate under Section 85 could not be carried forward and that Section 71(1) did not provide an option to the assessee to not adjust income against loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:06:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (12) TMI 65 - ITAT  BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58178</link>
      <description>The Departmental appeal was allowed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal restored the original order of the ITO, concluding that the CIT(A) erred in allowing a straight deduction of dividend income under Section 85 before computing losses. The Tribunal also clarified that the rebate under Section 85 could not be carried forward and that Section 71(1) did not provide an option to the assessee to not adjust income against loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>