<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 96 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58175</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed under s. 273(2)(a) of the IT Act 1961 for the assessment year 1979-80. The Tribunal held that the assessee, having no obligation to file an advance tax statement due to previous nil income assessments, was not liable for the penalty. Emphasizing the quasi-criminal nature of penalty imposition, the Tribunal canceled the penalty, citing relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:02:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 96 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58175</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed under s. 273(2)(a) of the IT Act 1961 for the assessment year 1979-80. The Tribunal held that the assessee, having no obligation to file an advance tax statement due to previous nil income assessments, was not liable for the penalty. Emphasizing the quasi-criminal nature of penalty imposition, the Tribunal canceled the penalty, citing relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>