<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 105 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58156</link>
    <description>A composite collaboration payment for technical advice, training, ancillary services and personnel support was not treated as consideration for acquiring a &quot;plant&quot; asset, because the know-how documents alone did not constitute complete, practical know-how; depreciation was therefore denied. The assessee&#039;s business, however, involved successive manufacturing and processing stages using skilled labour and specialised equipment to produce an end-product distinct from the raw material, and this supported classification as an industrial company engaged in manufacture or processing of goods; the concessional tax rate was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 105 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58156</link>
      <description>A composite collaboration payment for technical advice, training, ancillary services and personnel support was not treated as consideration for acquiring a &quot;plant&quot; asset, because the know-how documents alone did not constitute complete, practical know-how; depreciation was therefore denied. The assessee&#039;s business, however, involved successive manufacturing and processing stages using skilled labour and specialised equipment to produce an end-product distinct from the raw material, and this supported classification as an industrial company engaged in manufacture or processing of goods; the concessional tax rate was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>