<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 55 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58135</link>
    <description>Registration orders under Section 185 of the Income-tax Act were treated as dependent on the existence of valid assessment orders. Once the Tribunal annulled the assessment orders as nullities, the foundation for the registration orders disappeared and they did not survive independently. As a result, the proposed question under Section 256(1) lost its live character and ceased to be a referable question of law. The reference applications were therefore not maintainable and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:19:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 55 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58135</link>
      <description>Registration orders under Section 185 of the Income-tax Act were treated as dependent on the existence of valid assessment orders. Once the Tribunal annulled the assessment orders as nullities, the foundation for the registration orders disappeared and they did not survive independently. As a result, the proposed question under Section 256(1) lost its live character and ceased to be a referable question of law. The reference applications were therefore not maintainable and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>