<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 54 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58134</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection in part. It affirmed the treatment of wagering loss as a deductible expenditure under section 57(iii) of the IT Act. The income from horse-racing and betting was classified as business income rather than income from other sources. However, the Tribunal held that horses do not qualify as &#039;plant&#039; for depreciation purposes, denying the allowance of depreciation on the maintained horses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:16:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 54 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58134</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection in part. It affirmed the treatment of wagering loss as a deductible expenditure under section 57(iii) of the IT Act. The income from horse-racing and betting was classified as business income rather than income from other sources. However, the Tribunal held that horses do not qualify as &#039;plant&#039; for depreciation purposes, denying the allowance of depreciation on the maintained horses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>