<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 103 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58105</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed Departmental appeals, upholding the AAC&#039;s decision to cancel penalties imposed by the WTO under s. 18(1)(a) of the WT Act, 1957. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s delay in filing returns was without motive or reasonable cause, emphasizing her age, illiteracy, voluntary filing, and cooperation with tax authorities. The judgment highlighted the lack of contumacious conduct or deliberate omission, deeming the penalties unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 103 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58105</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed Departmental appeals, upholding the AAC&#039;s decision to cancel penalties imposed by the WTO under s. 18(1)(a) of the WT Act, 1957. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s delay in filing returns was without motive or reasonable cause, emphasizing her age, illiteracy, voluntary filing, and cooperation with tax authorities. The judgment highlighted the lack of contumacious conduct or deliberate omission, deeming the penalties unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>