<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 91 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58098</link>
    <description>Under section 34(1)(c) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, the interest of lineal descendants in Mitakshara joint family property is aggregated for rate purposes when computing the principal value of the deceased&#039;s estate. The Tribunal preferred later High Court authority holding that the provision removes disparity in estate duty incidence and rejected the article 14 challenge to aggregation. Accordingly, the lineal descendants&#039; share was includible in the estate, and the accountable person&#039;s objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:15:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 91 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58098</link>
      <description>Under section 34(1)(c) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, the interest of lineal descendants in Mitakshara joint family property is aggregated for rate purposes when computing the principal value of the deceased&#039;s estate. The Tribunal preferred later High Court authority holding that the provision removes disparity in estate duty incidence and rejected the article 14 challenge to aggregation. Accordingly, the lineal descendants&#039; share was includible in the estate, and the accountable person&#039;s objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>