<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 95 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58089</link>
    <description>Gratuity exemption under section 10(10) applies only to an employee whose salary can be computed under the statutory formula; a Life Insurance Corporation agent paid by commission and treated separately from employees does not satisfy that condition, so the gratuity remained taxable. The Life Insurance Corporation of India (Agents) Regulations, 1972 were part of the relevant material for determining the assessee&#039;s status and did not constitute fresh material requiring a further opportunity of hearing before the Income-tax Officer. The exemption claim therefore failed, and the objection based on alleged new material was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:48:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 95 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58089</link>
      <description>Gratuity exemption under section 10(10) applies only to an employee whose salary can be computed under the statutory formula; a Life Insurance Corporation agent paid by commission and treated separately from employees does not satisfy that condition, so the gratuity remained taxable. The Life Insurance Corporation of India (Agents) Regulations, 1972 were part of the relevant material for determining the assessee&#039;s status and did not constitute fresh material requiring a further opportunity of hearing before the Income-tax Officer. The exemption claim therefore failed, and the objection based on alleged new material was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>