<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 86 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58080</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 due to lack of jurisdiction. The assessment made under the IAC&#039;s directions under section 144B was deemed valid, and the Explanation to section 263 was interpreted to not have retrospective effect. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on legal precedents and the nature of the provisions involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:19:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 86 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58080</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 due to lack of jurisdiction. The assessment made under the IAC&#039;s directions under section 144B was deemed valid, and the Explanation to section 263 was interpreted to not have retrospective effect. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on legal precedents and the nature of the provisions involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>