<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (6) TMI 48 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58064</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision classifying the surplus from the sale of land as capital gains rather than business profits. They considered the company&#039;s consistent treatment of the land as a capital asset, its initial purpose of constructing staff quarters, and the financial challenges faced. Emphasizing the real nature of the operation and citing relevant case law, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal and supported the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:39:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (6) TMI 48 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58064</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision classifying the surplus from the sale of land as capital gains rather than business profits. They considered the company&#039;s consistent treatment of the land as a capital asset, its initial purpose of constructing staff quarters, and the financial challenges faced. Emphasizing the real nature of the operation and citing relevant case law, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal and supported the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>