<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 91 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58056</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by reversing or upholding various directions of the Commissioner (Appeals) based on the merits and legal precedents. Key decisions included allowing a higher depreciation rate on specific plant and machinery, reversing the addition to the written down value of assets on amalgamation, and disallowing certain expenses such as guest house expenses and provision for payment of pension. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were guided by expert opinions, court rulings, and statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:18:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 91 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58056</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by reversing or upholding various directions of the Commissioner (Appeals) based on the merits and legal precedents. Key decisions included allowing a higher depreciation rate on specific plant and machinery, reversing the addition to the written down value of assets on amalgamation, and disallowing certain expenses such as guest house expenses and provision for payment of pension. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were guided by expert opinions, court rulings, and statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>