https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58045 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the investment allowance for machineries used in the manufacture of glass fibre and its yarn, and the inclusion of work-in-progress in the computation of capital employed for section 80J. The decisions on depreciation on the furnace, investment allowance on fire safety equipment, and salary paid to car drivers were not explicitly detailed. The appeal ITA No. 3995/Bom./88 was partly allowed. en-us Tue, 05 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:47:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58045 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the investment allowance for machineries used in the manufacture of glass fibre and its yarn, and the inclusion of work-in-progress in the computation of capital employed for section 80J. The decisions on depreciation on the furnace, investment allowance on fire safety equipment, and salary paid to car drivers were not explicitly detailed. The appeal ITA No. 3995/Bom./88 was partly allowed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 05 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58045