<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (5) TMI 43 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58044</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner lacked justification to invoke jurisdiction under section 263 and set aside the assessment order. The Tribunal further found that the specific expenditures in question were not erroneous in law. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s order was overturned, and the assessment order was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:45:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (5) TMI 43 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58044</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner lacked justification to invoke jurisdiction under section 263 and set aside the assessment order. The Tribunal further found that the specific expenditures in question were not erroneous in law. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s order was overturned, and the assessment order was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>