<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 95 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58042</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT (Appeals) order for the assessment year 1984-85. It was held that the assessee, an investment company, did not have positive distributable income for declaring dividends. The tribunal emphasized the exclusion of long-term capital gains from gross total income for computing distributable income and the importance of considering judicial decisions in interpreting provisions of the Income Tax Act. Capital gains were not considered as commercial profits for dividend distribution, leading to the conclusion that the additional tax imposed by the Assessing Officer was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:41:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 95 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58042</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT (Appeals) order for the assessment year 1984-85. It was held that the assessee, an investment company, did not have positive distributable income for declaring dividends. The tribunal emphasized the exclusion of long-term capital gains from gross total income for computing distributable income and the importance of considering judicial decisions in interpreting provisions of the Income Tax Act. Capital gains were not considered as commercial profits for dividend distribution, leading to the conclusion that the additional tax imposed by the Assessing Officer was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>