<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (12) TMI 84 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58017</link>
    <description>An intimation under section 143(1) can be appealable under section 246(c) where it effectively imposes a tax liability that the assessee denies, because the existence of other remedies under sections 143(2)(b), 154 or 264 does not extinguish the statutory right of appeal. A demand based on a wrong assumption about the source or character of income may, in substance, amount to a denial of liability to be assessed in the manner adopted by the Assessing Officer, bringing the matter within section 246(c). The commentary states that the appeal was maintainable in such facts and that dismissal in limine by the first appellate authority was erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:24:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (12) TMI 84 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58017</link>
      <description>An intimation under section 143(1) can be appealable under section 246(c) where it effectively imposes a tax liability that the assessee denies, because the existence of other remedies under sections 143(2)(b), 154 or 264 does not extinguish the statutory right of appeal. A demand based on a wrong assumption about the source or character of income may, in substance, amount to a denial of liability to be assessed in the manner adopted by the Assessing Officer, bringing the matter within section 246(c). The commentary states that the appeal was maintainable in such facts and that dismissal in limine by the first appellate authority was erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>