<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 95 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58007</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s orders, allowing the losses for both assessment years to be carried forward and set off in future years, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The original returns filed by the assessee were deemed defective but not invalid, as no notice under section 139(9) was issued. The subsequent returns filed were considered replacements for the original ones, enabling the losses to be carried forward despite jurisdictional issues in one of the assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:54:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 95 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58007</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s orders, allowing the losses for both assessment years to be carried forward and set off in future years, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The original returns filed by the assessee were deemed defective but not invalid, as no notice under section 139(9) was issued. The subsequent returns filed were considered replacements for the original ones, enabling the losses to be carried forward despite jurisdictional issues in one of the assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>