<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 118 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58002</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act on a registered firm for late filing of income tax return for the assessment year 1980-81. The appeal against the penalty was dismissed, affirming the AAC&#039;s order. The Tribunal aligned with the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision, concluding that the penalty was rightly imposed despite the firm having no tax liability after payment of advance tax and TDS.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:41:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 118 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58002</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act on a registered firm for late filing of income tax return for the assessment year 1980-81. The appeal against the penalty was dismissed, affirming the AAC&#039;s order. The Tribunal aligned with the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision, concluding that the penalty was rightly imposed despite the firm having no tax liability after payment of advance tax and TDS.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>