<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 82 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57991</link>
    <description>Revision under section 263 was considered valid where the original assessment had not examined the claim for investment allowance. The assessee&#039;s activity of processing metal or tin sheets was treated as not amounting to manufacture or production, because the end-product remained substantially the same as the raw material and the audit report itself described the concern as a processing company. Authorities relied on by the assessee were distinguished on their facts, while the Revenue&#039;s authorities supported the principle that failure to make necessary inquiries can render an assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue. The Commissioner&#039;s revisionary order was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:17:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 82 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57991</link>
      <description>Revision under section 263 was considered valid where the original assessment had not examined the claim for investment allowance. The assessee&#039;s activity of processing metal or tin sheets was treated as not amounting to manufacture or production, because the end-product remained substantially the same as the raw material and the audit report itself described the concern as a processing company. Authorities relied on by the assessee were distinguished on their facts, while the Revenue&#039;s authorities supported the principle that failure to make necessary inquiries can render an assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue. The Commissioner&#039;s revisionary order was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>