https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57990 The ITAT Bombay-A ruled that the assessee should be treated as a resident for the assessment year 1983-84. The Tribunal found that the assessee's trips abroad were not for the purpose of employment outside India as required by the Income Tax Act. Since the assessee was employed by an Indian employer and received salary in India, the Tribunal concluded that the trips abroad were related to Indian employment and did not qualify as leaving India for employment outside the country. The appeal was allowed, overturning the CIT(A)'s decision. en-us Wed, 25 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:15:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57990 The ITAT Bombay-A ruled that the assessee should be treated as a resident for the assessment year 1983-84. The Tribunal found that the assessee's trips abroad were not for the purpose of employment outside India as required by the Income Tax Act. Since the assessee was employed by an Indian employer and received salary in India, the Tribunal concluded that the trips abroad were related to Indian employment and did not qualify as leaving India for employment outside the country. The appeal was allowed, overturning the CIT(A)'s decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 25 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57990