<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 146 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the C.I.T. (A)&#039;s decision to withdraw the section 80-J relief granted on the barges. It held that barges should be considered ships for the purpose of section 80-J, entitling the assessee to the deduction. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by statutory definitions, judicial precedents, and the previous treatment of a barge as a ship for investment allowance purposes by the C.I.T. (A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:03:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 146 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the C.I.T. (A)&#039;s decision to withdraw the section 80-J relief granted on the barges. It held that barges should be considered ships for the purpose of section 80-J, entitling the assessee to the deduction. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by statutory definitions, judicial precedents, and the previous treatment of a barge as a ship for investment allowance purposes by the C.I.T. (A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>