<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 50 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57974</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 7,73,931. It concluded that the payment made by the assessee to the Official Liquidator was a revenue expenditure to protect the right to earn income, not to acquire a new right. The Tribunal considered the expenditure necessary to ensure the continued receipt of business income and referenced case law to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:40:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 50 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57974</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 7,73,931. It concluded that the payment made by the assessee to the Official Liquidator was a revenue expenditure to protect the right to earn income, not to acquire a new right. The Tribunal considered the expenditure necessary to ensure the continued receipt of business income and referenced case law to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>