<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 49 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57973</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 40,000 upheld by the CIT(A) was unjustified. It directed the ITO to reconsider the assessee&#039;s application for accumulation in Form No. 10, emphasizing that the request should be evaluated based on the substance and spirit of the law rather than technical flaws. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 49 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57973</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 40,000 upheld by the CIT(A) was unjustified. It directed the ITO to reconsider the assessee&#039;s application for accumulation in Form No. 10, emphasizing that the request should be evaluated based on the substance and spirit of the law rather than technical flaws. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>