<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (10) TMI 79 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the deduction of legal expenses incurred for drawing up a lease deed by a private discretionary trust in computing property income. The Tribunal deemed the expenses as revenue expenditure related to letting out the property, not capital investment. It applied the real income concept, deducting the legal expenses from the actual rent received. The Tribunal rejected the need to bifurcate the expenditure between property income and income from other sources, emphasizing the expenses&#039; direct relation to property letting. The Judicial Member supported this decision, citing relevant legal provisions and dismissing alternative deduction claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (10) TMI 79 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the deduction of legal expenses incurred for drawing up a lease deed by a private discretionary trust in computing property income. The Tribunal deemed the expenses as revenue expenditure related to letting out the property, not capital investment. It applied the real income concept, deducting the legal expenses from the actual rent received. The Tribunal rejected the need to bifurcate the expenditure between property income and income from other sources, emphasizing the expenses&#039; direct relation to property letting. The Judicial Member supported this decision, citing relevant legal provisions and dismissing alternative deduction claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>