<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (1) TMI 106 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that hotel charges during leave period are not covered by section 10(5)(ii) for exemption under the Income-tax Act. The interpretation of &#039;travel assistance&#039; in relation to travel concessions excludes expenses like hotel charges, which do not qualify for exemption. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the disallowance of hotel charges for exemption under section 10(5).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (1) TMI 106 - ITAT BOMBAY-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that hotel charges during leave period are not covered by section 10(5)(ii) for exemption under the Income-tax Act. The interpretation of &#039;travel assistance&#039; in relation to travel concessions excludes expenses like hotel charges, which do not qualify for exemption. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the disallowance of hotel charges for exemption under section 10(5).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>