<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 86 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57923</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal canceled the penalties imposed under s. 272A(2)(e) for delay in filing returns by charitable trusts. Citing conflicting views, the tribunal favored the assessees, aligning with the principle of resolving doubts in favor of the taxpayer, following the Supreme Court decision in CIT vs. Vegetable Products. The decision emphasized interpreting tax provisions to ensure fairness and uphold taxpayer rights, particularly concerning charitable organizations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:43:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 86 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57923</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal canceled the penalties imposed under s. 272A(2)(e) for delay in filing returns by charitable trusts. Citing conflicting views, the tribunal favored the assessees, aligning with the principle of resolving doubts in favor of the taxpayer, following the Supreme Court decision in CIT vs. Vegetable Products. The decision emphasized interpreting tax provisions to ensure fairness and uphold taxpayer rights, particularly concerning charitable organizations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>