<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 90 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the IT Act, determining that the liability had ceased, requiring inclusion in the total income for the assessment year 1982-83. Emphasizing strict interpretation of Section 41(1) of the IT Act, the Tribunal rejected the argument that the possibility of liability revival due to a potential appeal justified withholding the amount from taxation. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT&#039;s jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal, holding the order valid and in the interest of Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 90 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the IT Act, determining that the liability had ceased, requiring inclusion in the total income for the assessment year 1982-83. Emphasizing strict interpretation of Section 41(1) of the IT Act, the Tribunal rejected the argument that the possibility of liability revival due to a potential appeal justified withholding the amount from taxation. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT&#039;s jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal, holding the order valid and in the interest of Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>