<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 82 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57921</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the cancellation of the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The decision was based on the absence of deliberate concealment or fraud, the bona fide nature of the valuation estimates, and the transparent disclosure of valuation details by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:40:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 82 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57921</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the cancellation of the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The decision was based on the absence of deliberate concealment or fraud, the bona fide nature of the valuation estimates, and the transparent disclosure of valuation details by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>