<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 85 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57920</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the departmental appeal, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s decision that the assessee&#039;s evaluation of the film&#039;s performance and loss justified the lower valuation of undistributed areas. The ITAT declined to consider the alternative ground assessed by the CIT (A) due to additional details not presented to the ITO, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s order in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 85 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57920</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the departmental appeal, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s decision that the assessee&#039;s evaluation of the film&#039;s performance and loss justified the lower valuation of undistributed areas. The ITAT declined to consider the alternative ground assessed by the CIT (A) due to additional details not presented to the ITO, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s order in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>