<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (6) TMI 73 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57912</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the departmental appeal, affirming the treatment of bad debts by allowing processing charges as bad debts and remitting the matter to consider each debtor&#039;s case. Additionally, the tribunal held that the savings of raw-films should be included as income using the regular valuation method, resulting in the inclusion of Rs. 3,27,902 as income for the year under appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:26:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (6) TMI 73 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57912</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the departmental appeal, affirming the treatment of bad debts by allowing processing charges as bad debts and remitting the matter to consider each debtor&#039;s case. Additionally, the tribunal held that the savings of raw-films should be included as income using the regular valuation method, resulting in the inclusion of Rs. 3,27,902 as income for the year under appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>