<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (7) TMI 68 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57903</link>
    <description>Materials used in a research laboratory were treated as goods required for use in manufacture because the research was directly connected with production, plant improvement, import substitution and development of new fibre variants, making it commercially necessary for effective manufacture. Electrical goods used for factory lighting, including tubes, bulbs, fans and spares, were also treated as goods required for use in manufacture because factory operations depended on them as part of the manufacturing environment. On that footing, the disallowance was held unsustainable and the disputed items were directed to be included in the recognition certificate for consequential action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:05:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (7) TMI 68 - ITAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57903</link>
      <description>Materials used in a research laboratory were treated as goods required for use in manufacture because the research was directly connected with production, plant improvement, import substitution and development of new fibre variants, making it commercially necessary for effective manufacture. Electrical goods used for factory lighting, including tubes, bulbs, fans and spares, were also treated as goods required for use in manufacture because factory operations depended on them as part of the manufacturing environment. On that footing, the disallowance was held unsustainable and the disputed items were directed to be included in the recognition certificate for consequential action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>