<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (9) TMI 41 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57902</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court held that the Deputy Commissioner did not exceed jurisdiction under section 52 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 because examining whether the transaction was a sale in the course of export was part of deciding whether tax was payable on a sale within the State. It further held that sales of goods to foreign-bound transit passengers at the airport constituted sales in the course of export, since the transaction required the goods to be taken out of India and was supported by statutory and transactional controls linking the sale to export. The sale was therefore not taxable as an intra-State sale in Maharashtra, and the assessee obtained relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (9) TMI 41 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57902</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court held that the Deputy Commissioner did not exceed jurisdiction under section 52 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 because examining whether the transaction was a sale in the course of export was part of deciding whether tax was payable on a sale within the State. It further held that sales of goods to foreign-bound transit passengers at the airport constituted sales in the course of export, since the transaction required the goods to be taken out of India and was supported by statutory and transactional controls linking the sale to export. The sale was therefore not taxable as an intra-State sale in Maharashtra, and the assessee obtained relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>